Tag: writing

Mary Ann Bernal, Forgiving Nero, (‎Whispering Legends Press, 2021)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/57097873-forgiving-nero

The story of two star-crossed romances, with some liberties taken with history

(The fictional) Traian Aelius Protacius, guards the boy Lucius (Nero), sent to live with his aunt Lepida during the rule of Caligula while his mother Agrippina is in exile. Attending the boy is slave woman Vena, a secret Christian, to whom Traian is attracted.

Nero asks for a tutor to teach him the lyre (cithara). He performs for the children of slaves and freedmen. He longs for a world where he can play his music and marry Acte, but Agrippina sweet talks Claudius into betrothing him to his daughter Octavia, Nero’s adoptive sister.

Seneca tutors him in other studies. Paul of Tarsus visits Vena’s Christians.

This is the story of two star-crossed romances. Nero can’t marry Acte because his family demands his dynastic marriage to Octavia. Traian marries Vena, but it must be in secret due to her class as slave.

It twists history as we know it on quite a number of points: treats Octavia as in love with Nero (they hated each other); Nero’s music as proficient (his talent was described as mediocre); Nero trusts in his mother’s goodness (he banished her to rid himself of her influence and had her murdered); Camulodunum is a picture of peaceful assimilation (the Boudicca revolt showed, viscerally, how much the British tribes hated the invaders); Claudius is killed by his wife giving him poisoned mushrooms (that was Augustus); Britannicus is killed by poisoned water (it was hot soup that was cooled down by adding poisoned water); Domitius Ahenobarbus is some guy who gives Nero a villa (he was his biological father); Acte wants to be empress (Nero’s interest in her was already replaced by Poppaea by the time he rid himself of Octavia); Acte is interested in Christianity (that was Poppaea, who was interested in Judaism); Domitia Lepida generously offers her villa to Acte (there seems to be no reason for inventing this in either woman’s character arc); Agrippina burst through the curtains of her hidey-hole onto the Senate floor, shouting what was to be done (this was too outrageous even for Agrippina); Poppaea suddenly gets a brainwave that she needs to bear Nero a son (everyone would have known that the emperor needed an heir); Nero rejects proposals by midwives to perform a Caesarean section in order to save Poppaea’s life (Lex Caesarea prohibited performing the operation unless the mother was dead or dying, and the mother was not expected to survive).

I don’t mind non-historical invention in historical fiction, but there should be some point to it, some reason for the storyline to be different from what we are familiar with. This history is juicy enough without outright inventing stuff.

The alternating references to the emperor as Lucius or Nero are confusing. I get it that he changed after becoming emperor, but he should be referred to by one name in each timeframe.

The writing style tends to the Telling rather than Showing, the dialogue quite stilted. For such a familiar story, we really need the writing to offer something special. It gets poorer as the pages progress.

Conn Iggulden, Tyrant, (Michael Joseph, 2025)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/220160369-tyrant

Nero’s rise, from his mother’s wedding to her murder

On the emperor’s wedding day, Praetorians smash into the home of Junius Silanus Torquatus, accusing him of incest with his sister. He is Agrippina’s first persecution. She aims to wipe out the bloodline of Augustus. Claudius is officially adopting her son Lucius (Nero).

Nero and his friends torment their tutor to death with a wasp’s nest. He gets a whipping and a new tutor—Seneca. Agrippina gets Rufrius replaced as Prefect of the Praetorians by her favourite Burrus. The slaves address her as ‘empress’, and she calls herself ‘Augusta’ on coins. Nero dons the toga virilis, a year early, but his virilis ceremony is dominated by the whispers over his mother’s self-appointed title.

Agrippina sweet-talks Claudius into betrothing Nero to Octavia, his sister by adoption.

Nero is crazy for chariot-racing. He’s the son of Ahenobarbus, after all. At the races, he is smitten by the pale-skinned Greek freedwoman Acte. With Claudius away in the provinces, Nero sits some legal cases, with some wisdom. Among them are some Jews, followers of Iesus.

Agrippina poisons her husband just in time to raise her son. Nero comes to the purple and sends his mother to live in Misenum.

My favourite feature of Iggulden is the relationships. The dialogue on Nero’s and Octavia’s wedding night is heart-breaking. The conversation between his friends and him at the mock naval battle is full of psychological intricacy. The relationship between him and his mother is complex.

Conn Iggulden, Nero, (‎Penguin, 2025)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/198344721-nero

The story of Nero’s origins, surviving three emperors and a horrible family

Barbo (Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus) is readying his team of horses to ride for Rome. His wife (Agrippina), though pregnant with his child, finally, after nine years of marriage, hates him.

Sejanus is before Emperor Tiberius, pleading for his life. The corrupt prefect is thrown down the Gemonian stairs. Tiberius is dying.

Gaius (Caligula) takes his sister Agrippina by the arm, a bit too roughly. He wants to reminisce about their childhood, when he was happy. He seems scarred from his years on Capreae. The last living heir to the throne, he senses enemies all around him.

Caligula becomes emperor and wants his sisters by his side, to the dismay of their husbands. His megalomania increases by the day, until finally he pushes the Praetorians too far, and they assassinate him, choosing Uncle Claudius to replace him. Eventually, Agrippina gets her hooks into Claudius, and Nero becomes the emperor’s stepson. Nero’s relationship with his mother is strained from the beginning.

The only thing I didn’t like about this novel was the title. Lucius (Nero) is a child, shoved off into adoption in the slums; he survives three emperors and doesn’t re-enter the story until page 197.

The characters, monsters to a man (except Claudius, who is at least smart), are all believable, the intricacies of relationships are handled with subtlety, and the dialogue is good. We know them from history, but here we know them personally. We see the invasion of Britain also from the British tribes’ point of view.

The women are equally vicious, though more sympathetic. Messalina, upon Claudius’s inauguration, ‘pressing her hands together over her womb, like a little girl waiting for presents’. Agrippina, upon seeing her son again after her imprisonment, ‘her hands opening and closing like flowers at her side’.

I never tire of hearing the story of Rome’s emperors, and Iggulden tells it well.

M. Hadassah Wells, When the Walls Fell, (‎School of Hope Publishers, 2025)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/239223215-when-the-walls-fell

This book tells the story of the legendary* ‘fall of Jericho’, closely following the Book of Joshua.

Rahab the harlot plies her trade in the streets of Jericho; her heart beats. The Israelites are coming; their God ‘burned mountains, cracked seas, and swallowed cities in silence’.

Joshua is outside his tent in the camp at Shittim in Moab, remembering his leader. Moses was dead. But Joshua hears the command of the Lord, too. He sends two of his men, Salmon and Haziel, to scout. Rahab lets them in. She lets them down the walls with her scarlet cord.

‘The broken idols piled like refuse… stone shoulders chipped, heads shattered, empty sockets staring at the sky’ provide a gorgeous metaphor for what is soon to befall Jericho—to be defeated by the one true God.

Suspense for the big tumblin’ down moment is built by going through the arguments Rahab has with her family and neighbours, as she becomes a kind of spiritual leader for her community. I’m not a Christian, but the theology here seems sound. Within and without the walls, people are measured by whether they believe. ‘It won’t be the walls they fight,’ Rahab warns her brother, ‘it will be our hearts.’

Loved: ‘His fingers twitch like they still crave gold’, ‘And Rahab, the woman no one respected… stood in the moonlight and waited to be remembered’, ‘You’ve waited forty years for this’, ‘smoke rising in ribbons that braided into the pale sky’.

It’s beautifully written. Christians will find the expressions of the triumph of faith thrilling, but non-Christians, too, can appreciate this epic tale. The settings are beautifully described; the culture and way of life of the Late Bronze Age Levant comes alive. The characters have fully-formed arcs, and it’s full of emotion.

It is not the right time after the year we’ve had to be celebrating victories of the Israelites, whether legendary or historical. Just tell yourself—it’s a great story. I loved it.

* (and, incidentally, completely fictional, according to the archaeological record)