Tag: historical-fiction

  • Review: Julius Caesar

    Review: Julius Caesar

    William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar: The Amazing Play of The Great Roman General (Kindle 2023)

    Rereading a classic masterpiece screenplay

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/203879797-julius-caesar


    I’m a big fan of Shakespeare—who isn’t? But not all of us loved learning it in school. I did, and Julius Caesar was always my favourite. I loved discovering the meaning behind antiquated language and appreciating the timeless plays on words.
    It’s based on real history, with which we are all familiar. It features rich interesting characters—Brutus in particular, who is conflicted, torn between his love and respect for Caesar and his devotion to the idea that Rome must have no king.
    And it’s chock full of great lines. We all know the ‘Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears. I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him’ speech, but that’s not by any means the only memorable one. Immortal lines include: ‘the fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves’, ‘cowards die many times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once’, ‘cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war’, ‘et tu, Brute? Then fall, Caesar’, ‘I am constant as the Northern Star’, ‘the evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones’. And lesser known ones: ‘dwell I but in the suburbs of your good pleasure?’, ‘let us bathe our hands in Caesar’s blood, up to the elbows’, ‘whilst your purpled hands do reek and smoke’, oh, what a fall was there’, ‘this was the most unkindest cut of all’, ‘here was a Caesar, when comes such another?’, ‘mischief, thou art afoot’, there is a tide in the affairs of men’, ‘the elements so mixed in him that Nature might stand up and say to all the world, this was a man’.
    This is one of Shakespeare’s tragedies—not a comedy—and yet it’s full of witty puns that are still as funny as they were in Elizabethan days and humorous turns of phrase so gorgeous in their wordiness as only Shakespeare can do. Antony’s funeral speech is a masterclass in oratory (‘sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny’), the repetition of ‘and Brutus is an honourable man’ digs the cut over and over.
    I have never understood why this play is not much performed. In contrast, Romeo and Juliet, my second favourite, has a new performance every few years.
    One drawback to reading the play verbatim is that you don’t have the CliffNotes at the side explaining every little thing. I needed those when I was in primary school, but I’m educated enough and familiar enough with Shakespearean language not now to need them.
    The challenge to actors in learning their long lines of complex monologue is balanced by the prestige of playing Shakespeare.
    In conjunction with rereading this classic masterpiece, I watched the 2014 Theatre Classics film of the play on YouTube. Thus, I managed to catch every word and every nuance.

  • Review: Nero: Matricide, Music and Murder in Imperial Rome

    Review: Nero: Matricide, Music and Murder in Imperial Rome

    Anthony Everitt and Roddy Ashworth, Nero: Matricide, Music and Murder in Imperial Rome, (Random House, 2022)

    A wonderful telling of the history

    The author goes chronologically through the history of imperial Rome up to and including Nero, pointing out events and genealogies and their significance, from time to time branching off to tell a juicy story, such as when Caligula sacrificed a flamingo, leading to his assassination. Even his genitals were stabbed. Decimus Valerius Asiaticus, whose wife Caligula had slept with, said he wished he had done it.

    The structure is roughly chronological, while taking time out now and again to examine certain themes in greater detail—Roman cultural practices, the emperors’ sexual behaviours—which I thought was the perfect way to do it.

    It leaves in all the ‘dirt’ in the stories, such as the gruesome suicide of Cato the Younger, pulling out his own intestines, and doesn’t omit any of Suetonius’ slanderous gossip, so that’s great fun. Pays great attention to the ancient sources, while pointing out the political and personal prejudices of the ancient writers.

    I particularly loved the famous quips people said about people. When Caligula asked Gaius Salustius Passienus Crispus whether he had, like Caligula, slept with his sister, Passienus fudged the question with ‘not yet’. Juvenal wrote that Claudius’ third wife Valeria Messalina prostituted herself in a brothel ‘reeking of ancient blankets’. After Claudius’ death, Seneca, whom the emperor had banished to Corsica, got revenge by writing a satirical play entitled The Pumpkinification of the Deified Claudius. When a soothsayer predicted baby Nero would be emperor and would kill his mother, Agrippina said: Occidat dum imperet (He can kill me but just let him rule.) As we all know, Nero’s famous last words were ‘God, what an artist in me is dying.’

    So, was Nero a bad guy, or what? By and large, he was loved by the plebs, hated by the senators. He may as well have slept with his mother, he was so under her thumb, and he admitted openly that he murdered her. No, he probably did not set fire to Rome, though he may well have fiddled (actually, played the cithara) as it burned—that was how he generally reacted to momentous news. The stories of burning Christians are iffy. As an artist, he was monomaniacal but mediocre. As a ruler, he was no worse than many.

    See review on Goodreads.