Tag: ai

  • Review: The Mirror of Simple Souls

    Review: The Mirror of Simple Souls

    Aline Kiner, The Mirror of Simple Souls (Pushkin Press 2023)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/62014708-the-mirror-of-simple-souls?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=fts2fss5Oa&rank=2

    1310 Paris. Ysabel runs the infirmary in the Royal Beguinage where she was raised, the religious women shut away from the fumes of burning Templars. Now old, she takes in a little beggar, a red-haired girl, Maheut. She does what she can to nurse the girl, but what was the cure for anger? She gives the wild child a gift, an aquamarine. The stone will absorb her anger, Ysabel says.

    Franciscan Humbert has brought messages from his master Jean de Querayn to Marguerite Porete, imprisoned by the Inquisition. Humbert is looking for the red-headed girl.

    Maheut’s red hair—’the colour of the devil’—gets her trouble. And worse trouble—she’s pregnant. Ysabel foists Maheut on the widow Ade, unwillingly, and the widow and girl do not warm to one another. Maheut’s daughter Leonor connects with Ade in a way her mother never did.

    Next Maheut is foisted upon silk merchant Jeanne du Faut. Marguerite is burned at the stake. Ade translates Maguerite’s heretical book, The Mirror of Simple Souls, into Latin and in the course of the work comes closer to Humbert, and their indiscretion is witnessed by Clémence.

    The vengeful fingers of the Inquisition shatter the peaceful life of the Beguinage.

    This rich historical drama is beautiful and unpretentious, a wonderful piece of historical fiction, fluidly capturing the feel of the period. Though it holds interest, the plot is slow, like the pace of life probably was back then. No one is murdered until page 247. It is told in present tense, bringing the reader right down into the story. Despite the wealth of detail, the Voice—14th century Ysabel, Ade, Maheut and Humbert—remains authentic, the characters completely sympathetic. It paints a wonderful picture of the world of the beguines, neither lay nor cloistered, ‘neither Martha, nor Mary’.

    This review first appeared in Historical Novels Review.

  • Review: Shadows on a Stone Wall

    Review: Shadows on a Stone Wall

    Mary Letts, Shadows on a Stone Wall (Blaize Bailey Books 2007)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5371775-shadows-on-a-stone-wall?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=80fSTrqRDP&rank=1

    This is a wonderful book, with the humanity of Ian McEwan and the humour of Roddy Doyle. I’m recommending it to everyone I know who likes these authors. Plus it has the added thrill of a murder mystery and a love story.
    When her mother dies in a car accident, Julia and her children go home to Spain for the funeral, an ex-pat community in the mountain village where she had spent a painful childhood.
    The beautiful view she’d grown up with from the country farmhouse she has inherited is now blighted by the concrete and asphalt construction of Florida-style retirement condos for the new ‘Holidaylandia’, of which her mother had been a vocal opponent.
    Then the property developers discover an ancient skeleton buried under a collapsed wall on the edge of her mother’s land—but how ancient? Neolithic? Spanish Civil War? Many villages had guilty secrets under Franco.
    Impending interrogation by ‘La Guardia’ livens up the conversations at the local drinking holes, as everyone tries to remember what they got up to back then.
    Those were hippie days, a time when parenting had fewer boundaries. Suspicion also falls upon the history of Euro-hippies that ‘showed up’, ‘hung out’ and ‘split’.
    Practically everyone in town has some guilty secret, even the children.
    The book is beautifully written, and never descends to banality. The plot is good, and the characters are profoundly likeable. The use of dialogue is absolutely perfect.
    The children in the story are portrayed lovingly and amusingly, but never patronisingly, and are so real they must surely be taken from real life. They play major roles in the plot, and are multi-faceted in their own right, every bit as interesting as the adult characters.
    I truly hope this book is not completely autobiographical, or if it is, that Mary Letts has more than one life story to tell.

  • Review: Circe

    Review: Circe

    Madeline Miller, Circe (Little, Brown and Company 2018)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35959740-circe?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=RnlnvQxeHx&rank=1

    6 stars!
    Divine daughter of Helios, Circe defies the Olympians by using magical herbs to interfere with the lovers Scylla and Glaucos and is banished to the solitary island of Aiaia. There she is visited by numerous personages we know from mythology—Hermes, Daedalus—many whom she makes her lover—as well as several shiploads of would-be rapists, whom she transforms into pigs. She practices her witchcraft on Jason and Medea, her sister Pasiphaë, Odysseus and his men.
    Circe has powers we mortal women may envy, yet she knows her limitations. In exile, she repents and is forced to come to terms with her existence. She makes her peace with Penelope and Telemachus, even leading to new alliances.
    From her spectacular debut The Song of Achilles, Miller pushes further back in time, to a magical age when gods walked among men.
    And she has further honed her craft. Circe is chock full of delicious phrases. A first kiss, ‘I reached across that breathing air between us and found him.’ The god Helios, her father was ‘a harp with only one string, and the note it played was himself.’ Odysseus, who ‘had walked with those who could crack the world like eggs’, describes Achilles, ‘prophecies hung on him like ocean-weed’, and period-appropriate metaphors, such as ‘There were answers in me. I felt them, buried deep like last year’s bulbs, growing fat’ and ‘The sky darkened like iron’.
    Following in the footsteps of Mary Renault, Miller gorgeously retells the old myths in a way modern readers can relate to. She captures evocatively what it would be like to be a goddess among mortals.

  • Review: Milkman

    Review: Milkman

    Anna Burns, Milkman (Faber & Faber 2018)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36047860-milkman?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=8oLTfyWK3C&rank=1

    The dark, floaty, but witty tale of an unwelcome wooing in the dangerous world of the Northern Ireland Troubles
    This novel has a fantastic first line: ‘The day Somebody McSomebody put a gun to my breast and called me a cat and threatened to shoot me was the same day the milkman died.’ We enter a world (Northern Ireland during the Troubles) where everything, from what you name your child—if it’s Nigel or Troy, expect beats—to what you cook—it had better not be petit fours or amuse bouches—even to what car parts you dirty your living room carpet with, is divided between ‘their side of the street’ and ‘our side of the street’.
    Trying not to draw attention to herself in a dangerous environment, ‘middle-sister’ has the habit of ‘walking-while-reading’. This, however, is criticised by the gossips, especially when she becomes the unwelcome target of the amorous attentions of a ‘major paramilitary player’.
    Burns has a completely unique stream of consciousness writing style, with page after page of endless tangents, which, especially toward the end, become very witty, amidst all the murders.
    One technique is saying things three times in three different ways. For example: ‘being up on, having awareness, clocking everything… didn’t prevent things from happening’. She doesn’t say what ‘things’ she’s referring to, yet by that description, we learn something, get a sense of, absorb information on the feelings revolving around those ‘things’.
    People and places are not named, rather being referred to as ‘maybe-boyfriend’ or ‘third brother-in-law’, ‘the ten-minute-place’ or ‘over the water’. This glides you into a sort of fantasy world, creating an ‘uncomfortable floatiness’, a sense of unease, a feeling of foreboding and threat, in the midst of which one is nevertheless chuckling.

  • Review: Dancing on Thorns

    Review: Dancing on Thorns

    Rebecca Horsfall, Dancing on Thorns (Arrow 2005)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1540649.dancing_on_thorns

    A love story between two fascinating characters set to ballet, with poetry, tears and raptures


    For some reason she can’t herself explain, Nadia Petrovna, dowager étoile from the Diaghilev era, plucks awkward Jean-Baptiste St. Michel from the Académie in Paris for a scholarship at her Islington Ballet studio.
    Michel is the son of a famous choreographer working abroad, whom he has not seen in years, and after he leaves his mother for a career in ballet, they, also, become estranged.
    His uncle Jim dies, leaving him a large flat in Pimlico, which he and his Italian ballerino friend Primo convert into a dance studio and party pad. Enter Jonni, who has come to London as an aspiring actress and meets Michel at a party. As boys do, Michel casually lets Jonni know he’s been sleeping with his pas de deux partner Lynne, who casually informs Jonni that ‘we’ve all slept with each other in our gang’. He rudely ignores her for 90 pages while she follows along, infatuated by him and by his world, eventually being rewarded with a lover who, despite lack of commitment, makes love the way he dances.
    Michel is propelled into a lead role, and he catches the eye of Martyn Greene, artistic director of the British National Ballet. Islington’s head choreographer Charles Crown reveals his hand. Far from scrutinising his every plié out of opprobrium, as had been Michel’s impression, Crown has spotted his promise and has been moulding him for stardom. Jonni follows him, cooking for the dance troupe, as he climbs the ladder of success.
    I had always heard that the world of professional ballet was a competitive, bitchy scene, but the dancers in the Islington corps, here, love each other deeply, and these profound friendships carry them through the failures and successes of show biz and the highs and heartaches of their personal lives.
    In the end, in order to make things right, Michel has to confront his demons, and Jonni has to take a risk.
    Many interesting characters come onto the scene: the proud, statuesque prima ballerina Annette; the handsy actor Grant Noble; the leading actress full of wise words Maggie Lane; Leum the director who swears by saying ‘oh, panties!’; Roly, who went to a (dirty world in the ballet world) ‘stage school’; Carlotta di Gian-Tomaso, nicknamed the Giant Tomato; the tutor Marcus who became Marina; Jonni’s ‘tight-lipped, fifteen-denier tan-stockinged’ mother Veronica; the fat, vitriolic arts critic Boyle.
    All contribute to a story painted in all the colours of the rainbow, featuring some really beautiful writing. It’s a long novel, but I couldn’t put it down.

  • Review: The Origins of the Ottoman Empire

    Review: The Origins of the Ottoman Empire

    Mehmet Fuat Köprülü, The Origins of the Ottoman Empire (1935; this edition State University of New York Press 1991)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6918422-the-origins-of-the-ottoman-empire-soci-econ-hist-mid-east

    Dispels the myths of the misty early period and outlines the factors in the formation of the early state


    The dry academic style means this book is perhaps not one for the non-specialist Ottoman historian, comprised as it is of lectures by the professor. I purchased it, desperate for ideas for my novel about the daily lives of Kayis and Akhīs and their relations to other Turkic beyliks. I was disappointing in that, but nevertheless learned a lot.
    For most of us, what we see and read about the Ottomans dates from the period after Mehmed II’s conquest of Constantinople. These lectures cover those misty centuries before that, the 7th to the 12th centuries, particularly the Seljuk and Ilkhānate periods.
    Particularly valuable is the dispelling of certain myths. It is not true, says Köprülü, that the Ottomans invented their origins from the Kayı tribe during the reign of Murad II. Yes, Osman was the son of Ertuğrul, and no, he was not descended from the Prophet. The Kayı tribe was not related to the Mongol Qay tribe, and they did not migrate after the Mongol invasion of Khurāsān but rather came with the first Seljuk conquerors.
    Contrary to what you would think if you’re a fan, as I am, of the Diriliş Ertuğrul and Kuruluş Osman TV series, the proselytization of Islam was not yet a major preoccupation. The Turkmen tribes were messianic, ‘anticipating the mahdī’, and used religio-political propaganda, but the Seljuk state was not theocratic, and the Ottoman state never followed a policy of Islamization. Populations in Anatolia were a mixture of Muslims, Christians and some Jews, who lived in harmony, had the same dress and lifestyle, and eventually learned Turkish.
    Nevertheless, there were Christians, even Seljuk and Byzantine aristocrats who converted to Islam, but whatever pressures of a religious nature were applied were carried out more for political than for religious reasons. The privileged position of Muslims in the state organisation and desire to avoid jizya non-Muslim taxes were a factor. Köprülü contends that widespread conversion only occurred in the 15th century after the Ottoman conquest of the Balkans.
    Köprülü defines and outlines the political and religious affiliations of many groups we know of from this period, such as the various beyliks and religious orders. It’s untrue that Hājji Bektāsh, founder of Bektāshism, met with Ottoman rulers and played a role in founding the janissary corps. Unfortunately for my novel’s purposes, the Akhī women’s organisation Bājiyān-ı Rūm (Sisters of Anatolia) is probably fictional (but I won’t let that stop me from writing them into my fictional storyline).
    The major causative factors for the Ottomans’ rise (to summarise) were:
    • Their geographic location
    • The absence of hostility from neighbouring beyliks
    • Conditions favouring their entry into Europe and the Balkans
    • Elements of the population on the borders allowed them to capture Byzantine territory
    • In the Ottoman state, all power was under one ruler, not divided among the brothers and sons
    • A rapid conquest spreading westward coincided with Turks from Anatolia wishing to migrate
    • Ottoman conquest promised much booty and not many casualties, and prisoners were educated to become soldiers
    • The janissaries became a major military force during Murad I
    • Ottomans divided captured land into timars to grant to veterans, which were required to provide soldiers in proportion to their income
    • Ottomans continued the state organisation of the Seljuks, influenced by the Ilkhānate
    • Early rulers—Osman, Orhan, Murad—were skilful leaders

  • Review: The Driver

    Review: The Driver

    Mandasue Heller, The Driver (Hodder 2010)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11945787-the-driver?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_15

    Joe moves into a new flat on a council estate, pricking the interest of the fellow residents. There’s single mum Cheryl and her on-again-off-again ex, elderly overweight Molly and her cat, Carl and Mel, nosey racist Kettler, four Ukrainian hookers, and scary Eddie with his girlfriend Chrissie and scary pitbull.
    Cheryl throws Joe a welcome party, and he learns that Eddie is the hookers’ pimp as well as neighbourhood drug dealer and extortionist. Over the following weeks and months, he witnesses several of the pitiful personalities suffering under Eddie’s oppression and realises that Eddie keeps the hookers locked up.
    Eddie offers Joe a job as his driver while he does his drug runs. Joe becomes matey with Carl, a rather sweet druggie who works for Eddie. Eddie’s other boy Clive also seems less evil than his boss. Joe mostly does what he’s told, but nevertheless comes under suspicion from the gang. Everyone’s side stories come together in a clash on one eventful day at the estate.
    This book has no likable characters. The gangsters are monsters; the whores pitiful; the junkies disgusting. Even Joe, the hero, is hardly one you’d bring home to mother. It makes painful reading following the sufferings of the women done wrong by their disreputable menfolk. However, Katya—the prettiest of the hookers—wins one’s sympathy and does the right thing in the end. And Joe musters enough pluck to save the day.
    An easy read.

  • Review: The Hero with a Thousand Faces

    Review: The Hero with a Thousand Faces

    Joseph Campbell, The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949; this edition Princeton University Press 1972)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/588138.The_Hero_With_a_Thousand_Faces?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_30

    A ‘Bible’ for the student of mythology, religion, literature or psychotherapy


    Through a comprehensive analysis of the world’s mythology and folklore, Joseph Campbell outlines the universal motifs of adventure. He examines myth—the basis of religion, literature, psychoanalysis and human culture itself, the ‘secret opening through which the inexhaustible energies of the cosmos pour in’.
    The goal of the Hero is the ’self-achieved submission’ to bring back the union between god and the collective of people. To do so, he must symbolically die and be reborn as ‘universal man’, purged of sin (disobedience to the divine will) and death (identification with the mortal form). Campbell examines ‘archetypes of the collective unconscious’, showing how this formula is followed time and again, from the ancient Sumerian myth of Inanna to examples from modern psychoanalysis.
    The universal pattern followed by adventure myths is similar to the five-part structure of novels—beginning with the ‘inciting incident’, followed by several ‘slaps’ and maybe a ‘false victory’. The protagonist (hero) is required to overcome some obstacle to realise that he has been living a lie—the ’dark night of the soul’. To achieve the final goal, he needs to accept a new truth.
    The universal formula of myth begins with ‘the call to adventure’, where the hero, sometimes reluctantly, accepts his mission. He is helped by some ‘supernatural aid’ and may be given some magical weapons, ‘crosses the first threshold’ to undergo initiation and overcomes a series of often symbolic trials. He is often challenged by a usually-female temptress or a trickster-god. A crisis point arrives where the hero is close to death or is believed dead—he is swallowed by the unknown, in ‘the belly of the whale’. He may have to go through some form a self-annihilation to be reborn. He ‘meets with the goddess’, a mystical union where a usually-female authority figure intervenes to offer guidance, representing ‘the bliss of infancy regained’. Sometimes he ‘tricks’ the king or the god to obtain the treasure or the princess or vanquish the monster. He reconciles with the Father and returns home bringing the ‘ultimate boon’ to his family or kingdom.
    In Part II Campbell reviews the ‘cosmogonic (creation of the universe) cycle’, from psychology to metaphysics. Mythology can be understood as ‘psychology misread as biography, history and cosmology’. The cosmogonic cycle is carried forward by the hero as embodiment of his people’s destiny. The modern hero seeks to ‘bring to light again the lost Atlantis of the co-ordinated soul’. As for religious cult (as contrasted to black magic), it’s all about the community’s ‘submission to the inevitables of destiny’, e.g., not so much beseaching the gods to stave off winter starvation, but rather preparing the people for a period of hardship.
    Enormously erudite, peppered with quotes from Freud, Heraclitus, Euripides, Ovid. I found if I read more than 50 pages in one sitting, I got a headache. Almost half the text is in the footnotes, most of which, I admit, I didn’t read, even though they were probably all fascinating. The complexity is probably inevitable—he tackled a huge subject and he drew from every corner of the earth and from every historical period in his illustrative examples.
    For the student of mythology, this book is one of a triad of must-reads—including The White Goddess by Robert Graves and The Golden Bough by James Frazer. Although I have to give 5 stars because it’s a ‘great work’, I didn’t enjoy reading this one. Perhaps it’s because the material is not so new to me at time of reading.

  • Review: Bar Kokhba, the Jew who Defied Hadrian and Challenged Rome

    Review: Bar Kokhba, the Jew who Defied Hadrian and Challenged Rome

    Lindsay Powell, Bar Kokhba, the Jew who Defied Hadrian and Challenged Rome (Pen and Sword Military 2021)

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/57168141-bar-kokhba?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_23

    In researching my fourth novel, The Receptacles of St. Ananias, set in 132 CE when the Bar Kokhba Revolt, the third great Jewish revolt against Rome, was happening, I bought this (Kindle) book after searching for—without finding—a novel on the subject. Since then, I’ve found one—My Husband Bar Kokhba by Andrew Sanders—although there are many military novels from the Roman soldiers’ point of view. I selected this history as one hopefully less obviously Zionist in tone as Yigael Yadin’s or others’ take.
    There are two problems facing those wanting to learn about Bar Kokhba in the 21st century. The first is that unlike the first Jewish Revolt of 66-73 CE, where we have contemporaneous accounts from Flavius Josephus and Tacitus , the precious and almost only records we have of the Bar Kokhba Revolt are the letters discovered in the 1950s in the Cave of Letters, some of them in the general’s own hand. Without knowing any of the context, these letters can read as cryptically as the Dead Sea Scrolls.
    Rabbinical sources refer to the man as just ‘the southerner’ (from Judaea). Cassius Dio’s account of the war doesn’t name him, and neither do Christian writings mention him by name. We don’t even know the location of Betar (maybe modern Bittar), the site of the famous last stand. What we know is pieced together from scant references in ancient histories and archeological finds.
    What information we have is highly susceptible to mythologisation. For example, the destruction of the First Temple, the destruction of the Second Temple and the fall of Bar Kokhba are all said to have fallen on Tisha b’Av (the 9th of month Av). Twice may be a coincidence, but three times is, I would imagine, a myth. Bar Kokhba is supposed to have cut off the little fingers of his men to ensure none were ‘afraid or faint-hearted’, hardly something a general in his right mind would do. Unfortunately, Powell accepts these ‘facts’ as history.
    The second problem is that Bar Kokhba has been claimed ideologically as a David-against-Goliath hero of Zionism. David ben Gurion, first prime minister in 1948, proclaimed, ‘The chain that was broken in the days of Shimon ben Kokhba…was reinforced in our days, and the Israeli army is again ready for the battle in its own land.’ A revision of this viewpoint is under way, e.g., Elon Gilad (2015) .
    Powell recounts the history using a literary technique I found particularly interesting. He expounds the history from the origins of the Israelites to Bar Kokhba as he makes his way through the galleries of the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. He goes through the life of Emperor Hadrian as he’s on his way to interview Professor So-and-So. He paints the second century topography and road system by recounting the progress of Hadrian’s well-documented travels. He talks about events in Jewish history after recounting similar things that happened on his travels. It makes the read more like a chatty travelogue than a dry history book and makes it more accessible.
    There is a lot of information in this book which is only laterally related to Bar Kokhba. Unfortunately, so little is known about the man and the war he waged that otherwise, it would have been a very thin book.